I suspect I may break 50 score pairs for some of these subtests at some point, but I would never achieve enough data to definitively say much more than I can say now. That + the scaling of the item difficulty is really the best I can offer. There's just absolutely no way for me to acquire enough data to show that mathematically.Īnecdotally there are some people that have taken this that self reported their experience getting 19 SS on the WAIS as extremely easy, and then scored over 19 on this test. Without those two conditions satisfied and lacking factor loading analysis, it is impossible to assume that items:ī) discriminate increasing levels of difficulty while maintaining construct loadings.Īlthough I may sound tedious, I am just wondering about this additional headroom and how feasible it really is, but I commend your effort, as CAIT is by far the best all around composite test I think I have ever seen being so easily accessible and for free and I see many people commented their results being spot on with their WAIS.

that the same portion of the normative sample achieved raw scores significantly above those that merely reach expected linear correlations (the vertical data points line should be stretching upwards.

that some (not insignificant) portion of the normative sample is pushed against the 19 SS ceiling on WAIS (this would form a vertical line of data points at the 19 SS).

U/EqusB I get the intent and methodology behind extrapolation, of course, but based on the included plots for the score pairing normative sample (for Figure Weights and Visual Puzzles in particular since those two tests have the largest increases in assumed scaled score ceilings) - in order for the ceiling increases to be viable, shouldn't data show: Thanks for the test, it was amazing and informative. I expected more but whatever, my career has nothing to so with math anyway. I was disappointed from my score on figure weights. I don't know man, my scores are all over the place. Some other matrix tests posted here: Same range. Raven's 2 long form posted here: 137, 20 mins I remember scoring about the same though, and it was in Greek). Still my quantitative reasoning sucks, I know this.)ĭigit span: 16 (I have done this test again in the past as a part of ADHD assessment, so it might be a bit inflated or deflated.

If you have WAIS scores to send me, DM me.įigure weights: 13 (Someone called me on my phone at the last 2 mins and I just got totally lost and I gave up. Anyone that has taken matrices tests in the past can take it.Įdit: VCI is no longer available on classmarker, as people. If anyone is interested in trying it, let me know. People that have taken the WAIS only please.Īlso, I have a new high range matrices test that I would like to norm. If you have questions about the test please read the intro/FAQ before sending me a message.Įdit: For those interested, I am also looking at testing another CAIT Subtest. Please only use the classmarker links for the PRI section or if you've taken the WAIS before and want to submit your results for data collection.Īs part of the update, the norms and data reports have been updated based on the analysis of the data from the last round of testing. The VCI subtests have been automated thanks to MelerEcckmanLawler and can be taken at any time. **Please only take the PRI section on classmarker once please.ĬAIT will be back online again in the next few hours. If you haven't taken it and want to, send me a message and at some point I will send you a password protected link for a single attempt.

This is to conserve credits, as the tests have not yet been automated. I am only allowing people to take it if they have not taken it before, and one attempt only. PRI will be available again on Jan 6th but by REQUEST ONLY.

Digit span iq